logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.09.28 2017노537
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is that the Defendant did not commit any negligence falling under the proviso of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and it cannot be recognized that the Defendant sustained any injury by the victim of the instant traffic accident due to the instant traffic accident, and thus, the indictment of the instant facts charged should

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found guilty of the facts charged is erroneous by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the judgment.

2. Determination

A. In the case where the road signal apparatus is installed along the intersection, the crossing and the crosswalk are connected to the judgment on the defendant's violation of the signal, and the vehicle signal apparatus is installed only at the intersection, the vehicle signal apparatus should be deemed to also instruct the vehicle to not only the passage of the intersection but also the passage to the crosswalk immediately before the intersection. In such a case, the red light for the vehicle in such intersection is also ordered to stop at the intersection and the crosswalk. Thus, if the walking of the crosswalk is a green, all vehicles shall stop from the crosswalk stop at the crosswalk, and if it is lost as the crosswalk because the walking of the crosswalk is a red change, all vehicles shall not make a right-hand, but the vehicle on the right-hand side shall not interfere with the traffic of other vehicles that pass through the crosswalk and lose its character as the crosswalk.

Therefore, in cases where the vehicle signal of the intersection is red and the pedestrian walking of the crosswalk adjacent to the intersection is green, the driver of the vehicle does not stop in front of the above crosswalk and passes the crosswalk.

If a result of the occupational and occupational injury occurs while meeting, it constitutes a violation of signal under Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. In such cases, as long as the act of violating the above signal becomes a direct cause of traffic accident, the location of the accident shall be the crosswalk.

arrow