(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2021.01.28 2020고정1074

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2021.01.28 2020고정1074

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a BF rocketing taxi.

On August 16, 2020, the Defendant driven the above taxi on August 16, 2020, and tried to move the front road of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C from the direction of the D market to the speed of about 20km.

There are crosswalks where the vehicle signal and pedestrian signal are installed, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to properly observe the signal, and to check whether there is any person who gets on the way by reducing speed and keeping the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right are

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not stop the vehicle signal in front of the crosswalk and did not stop on the front side of the crosswalk, and did not find out the victim E (V) who passed the crosswalk to the port from the right side of the Defendant’s direction to the port in accordance with green pedestrian signals, and did not find out the victim E (V) who passed the crosswalk, and caused the damaged person to go beyond the road by shocking the left side of the victim’s front part of the said taxi.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, which is “influence in the mouth of the brush in front of the 12 weeks of treatment,” which requires approximately twelve weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of E traffic accidents;

1. A vehicle boom box, video CD in the diagnostic letter;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the actual investigation report on traffic accidents;

1. Relevant Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, and Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Sentence, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

참조조문

유사 판례

-서울남부지방법원 2017.06.28 2017고정619

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.06.29 2016고단3002

-인천지방법원 2018.02.13 2017고정2148

-청주지방법원 2018.07.12 2017고단2549

-서울동부지방법원 2016.07.13 2016고단1022