(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.11.20 2011가단415586

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.11.20 2011가단415586

손해배상(자)

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 482,285,505 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from December 27, 2010 to November 20, 2013, and the following.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) B is based on the basis of liability: B around December 27, 2010, C rocketing car around 23:20, 2010 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

2) While driving a vehicle and driving it into the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle in the front part of the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, while driving it into the lower part of the lower part of the 3-lane 453-6-Dong, Samsan-dong, Incheon, the lower part of the lower part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, which was proceeding beyond the stop line along the two-lane 453-6-dong, the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part, which led to the Plaintiff’s injury, such as the left part of the upper part of the lower part and the knee-free cutting condition, etc. (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for damages sustained by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case.

C. The limitation of liability: (a) the Plaintiff also committed an error in excess of the stop line (the vehicle was stopped according to the stop signal prior to the stop line on the first lane which is the left-hand one) and in the vicinity of the intersection, which led to the occurrence and expansion of damages, and thus, the Defendant’s liability is limited to 90% by taking account of the negligence ratio into account as 10%, inasmuch as the Plaintiff had been able to make a right-hand turn in the second lane, which is the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lane.

【Non-contentious facts, Gap’s evidence 2, Gap’s evidence 3-1, 2, and Gap.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.12.04 2013나62994

-서울동부지방법원 2014.11.26 2014고단1509

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.01.25 2015가단5005739

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.03.10 2016나9109

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.12.09 2016고단2550