logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2014. 10. 30. 선고 2014두9554 판결
(심리불속행)미국법인이 우리나라에 등록하지 않고 미국에서만 등록한 특허발명의 사용대가로 지급받는 소득은 국내원천소득으로 볼 수 없음[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2014Nu894 (Law No. 11, 2014)

Title

(C) Income received as consideration for the use of a patented invention registered only in the United States without registration in the Republic of Korea by a U.S. corporation shall not be deemed domestic source income.

Summary

(1) The Plaintiff’s instant income received by the Plaintiff pursuant to the instant contract cannot be deemed as domestic source income, since it is difficult to view the instant income as the price for using the patented invention that was registered only in the United States without registering in the Republic of Korea, and it cannot be deemed as the price for using the unregistered patent.

Cases

2014du9554 Revocation of revocation of revocation of rectification

Plaintiff-Appellee

AAA Overc (AA, Insc.)

Defendant-Appellant

The superintendent of the tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2014Nu894 Decided June 11, 2014

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow