logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.04.19 2013고단1376
범인도피교사
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 4,000,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 21, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 23:55 on the street of Gangnam-gu Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul Branch; (b) on the street, the police officer reported by having caused a traffic accident while operating a small E-Sa car owned by the Defendant while under the influence of alcohol planned to dispatch the police officer to the site and take on-site measures and control of drinking.

Accordingly, the Defendant asked B, who was accompanied by the above vehicle, to “I were punished four times due to drunk driving, and currently is during the period of suspension of drinking. When all times, I can immediately be detained at the site. I asked B to “I would like to act as if I would drive a brick,” so I would like to make a police officer called to the site B to make a false confession as if I driven the said vehicle.”

As a result, the Defendant had a police officer G and a policeman of the Gangnam Police Station, who was called to the scene B, testified as if he driven the above vehicle, and had the police officer of the Gangnam Police Station in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, to recognize that he was a driver at the traffic survey division office of the Gangnam Police Station in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and to force the police officer to take a drinking test.

2. At around 23:55 on December 21, 2012, Defendant B: (a) had no fact of causing a traffic accident by operating the E-Sa car owned by Party D in front of Gangnam-gu Seoul; and (b) had been asked by the Police Officer at the Gangnam Police Station, G police station, who was dispatched to the site, asked questions about who the person driving the said vehicle from Party B, and the Defendant actively made a false statement as the driver of the said vehicle according to Party A’s above; and (c) had conducted a alcohol test at the transportation survey office of the Gangnam Police Station at the Gangnam-gu Seoul Gangnam Police Station 2 Dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul.

Accordingly, the defendant, who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment, was allowed to escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police officer to I;

1. The output of the result of the measurement of drinking; and

arrow