logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2007. 6. 29. 선고 2006나106837 판결
[예금반환][미간행]
Plaintiff, Appellant

Korea Land Trust Co., Ltd. (Law Firm Barun, Attorney Park Ho-ho, Counsel for defendant-appellant)

Defendant, appellant and appellant

National Bank Co., Ltd. (Law Firm Gyeong & Yang, Attorneys Im-soo et al., Counsel for the defendant-appellant)

Conclusion of Pleadings

April 27, 2007

The first instance judgment

Seoul Central District Court Decision 2005Gahap82791 Decided October 19, 2006

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff 40,108,752,407 won and 20,054,333,506 won from August 8, 2005; 10,027,166,753 won from August 11, 2005; 10,027,252,148 won from August 16, 2005 to the delivery date of a copy of the complaint of this case; 6% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment; and 20% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment.

2. Purport of appeal

The part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the above revocation is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasons for the instant judgment concerning the instant case are as follows: (b) “The claim for restitution following the cancellation of the sales contract for the certificate of deposit (section 10 to section 15, No. 18, No. 13, No. 15, etc. of the first instance judgment)” in the “3.3. Judgment” are as stated in the column for reasons for the judgment of the first instance, except for the case as shown in the attached Form No. 13, No. 10, No. 15

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

Judges Kim Byung-chul (Presiding Judge)

arrow