logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2009. 08. 20. 선고 2009다38599 판결
명의신탁 부동산을 실명등기 아니한 경우 명의수탁자에 대한 압류의 효력[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Central District Court Decision 2008Na34636 (Law No. 05,07)

Case Number of the previous trial

Seoul Central District Court 2008Kadan1151 ( September 23, 2008)

Title

Where real estate under title trust is not registered in actual name, the effect of attachment to the title trustee.

Summary

A title truster who has been registered under a title trust agreement under the name of another person shall make the actual name registration within one year from the enforcement date of the Real Estate Real Name Act, and if he/she fails to comply therewith, he/she cannot oppose the tax authority that completed the seizure registration of ownership of the title trustee.

The decision

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the argument on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, all of the appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided

arrow