1.(a)

Defendant B shall not enter the real estate listed in attached Table B(2).

B. Defendant B shall be in annexed Form.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties, etc. 1) The Korean Association of the Korean War Veterans Association (hereinafter “previous church”) (hereinafter “previous church”).

The Korea Veterans Association (hereinafter referred to as the “Korea Veterans Association”) established on April 15, 1969 shall be the Korea Veterans Association (hereinafter referred to as the “Korea Veterans Association”).

) As a branch church belonging to the branch church, the real estate listed in paragraph 1 of the attached Table (hereinafter referred to as “instant church building”) with the contribution of its members.

) The real estate listed in paragraph 2 of the attached list and the annexed list (hereinafter referred to as “instant churchhouse”).

A) The church acquired and used as a church’s worship, church church’s worship, business affairs, company house, etc., and the previous church paid various taxes. At the time of the acquisition of the instant church building and church church’s house, the Seoul Labor Association Maintenance Foundation of the Korea War Veterans Association (hereinafter “Maintenance Foundation”).

(2) Upon completion of the registration under the name of the head of the previous church, Defendant B served as the head of the previous church and as the members of the previous church, and as a member of the members, they were filed a petition with the name of the non-liter, etc., on May 30, 1996, the Rono Council expressed its intention of resignation as to the members of the previous church, and on August 30, 1996, the Rono Council dispatched S pastors to the temporary chairman of the previous church.

B. On January 16, 1997, the resolution of the Defendants' withdrawal from the Rono-Council, etc. 1) The Rono-Council trial countries recognized Defendant B's act of dismissal and dismissed the Defendants' act of dismissal. On this occasion, Defendant B filed an appeal to the Rono-Council trial branch on July 8, 1997, but it became final and conclusive upon receiving a decision of dismissal from the general assembly trial branch on July 8, 1997. Accordingly, Defendant B held a party meeting on July 20, 197. At around 20:40, Defendant B held the party meeting on July 20, 1997. At the above time, the total of 13 persons, including Defendants B, C, V, X, Z, Z, and Defendant C, D, E, E, E, F and A, were to be held at the above party meeting on July 20, 197,