logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2012.09.21 2011고단2362
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동주거침입)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 2, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud in the Busan District Court's Busan District Court's Vice-Support, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Incheon Detention House on March 12, 201.

1. Co-Defendant and Co-Defendant C, on November 9, 201, with seven influences in name, around 08:00, and with seven influences in name, and with the victim E with the victim’s four floor D4 floor in Bupyeong-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, the password known to ordinary gate was partitioned into the body, and divated into the body and divated with the victim’s market price at KRW 121,00,000.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the victim's structure in collaboration with the above C, and stolen the victim's property jointly.

2. On March 28, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that he/she wishes to purchase a digital camera posted by the victim G at the SLR club on the website of the Internet, and that he/she would sell the digital camera to 200,000 won on the page to the victim. First, if he/she deposits 200,000 won to the bank account in the name of the bank account in the name of the Republic of Korea, he/she would deliver the digital camera on the phone.

However, since the defendant did not have a digital camera at the time, even if he receives the payment from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the digital camera to the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 20,000 from the victim to the account in the name of the Defendant in the name of the Defendant, a transfer from the victim under the name of the Defendant.

In addition, the Defendant received a total of 4830,000 won from around that time to April 11, 2012 under the same method as indicated in the attached Table 1 for sale proceeds, etc. of digital camera through the same eight times in total.

Accordingly, the defendant was provided property by deceiving the victims.

3. When there is a shortage of living expenses, the Defendant is guilty of deceiving the sales proceeds of model toy sales on the Internet and uses them.

arrow