A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 28, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 13:20 on February 28, 2013, 2013, the Defendant: (b) obstructed the business of the victim B; (c) told the victim B at the street store of the victim B (the 5-day old 5-year old 5-year old 5) opened in front of the D cafeteria which was held in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant was able to avoid the disturbance for 30 minutes by saying that the Defendant “bredd the Gads slick

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim B's street store business by force.

2. Interference with business activities for victims E;

A. On April 10, 2013, at around 17:30 on April 17, 2013, the Defendant expressed that “the victim will not be able to engage in weather, the same year of opening, and to engage in widthing services” to the victim at the G point in the operation of the victim E (n.e., the 63 years of age) located in the Gangseo-gun of Gangwon-gu, and that the victim would be able to 20 minutes of the disturbance, such as the victim’s shouldering the shoulder by hand, and let the victim go to the above restaurant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's flive sales business by force.

B. On April 10, 2013, at around 19:20 on April 10, 2013, the Defendant sought again at the place indicated in paragraph 3(a), and caused the victim E to take food customers who had kin in the said restaurant by avoiding disturbance between 20 minutes and verbal abuse.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's flive sales business by force.

3. Around 18:50 on April 10, 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed verbal abuse to the victim H (the age of 61) operated by the victim H (the age of 61) located in Pyeongtaek-gun of Gangseo-gun on the part of the Defendant; (b) 25 minutes of the instant restaurant, such as taking the victim K of the customer who provided alcohol at the said restaurant with verbal abuse, stating that “the victim shall not satisf,” and taking a bath for “the same year, weather year,” and taking a bath for the said restaurant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement of L/H;

1. Each statement of B and E;

1. Four copies of the on-site photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the investigation report (related to attachment of field photographs).