Defendant

A A Fines 4,00,000 won, Defendant B’s fine 3,000,000 won, and Defendant C’s fine 2,50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants, at around 00:10 on September 22, 2015, up to three singing rooms located in the Gu, for a period of up to 00:0 on September 22, 2015, the Defendants were required to present an identification card from G during a period of up to 112 reported and sent to the site by the police officer belonging to the F District of the police station, who was requested to present an identification card from G during a period of up to 112, and Defendant A, on his hand, called “satisfing off” and carried out the said G’s arms one time, and Defendant B, “A”, who is a reporter.

“Abrely, the chest of the above G was pushed down by hand.”

On the ground that Defendant A may not leave Defendant C out of the sing room continuously, Defendant A has to say that it is a slope H belonging to F District of the Police Station in the inside of the Republic of Korea for the reason that Defendant A would not leave Defendant C out of the sing room. “If the police is a police, the singular seat of the police.”

In the case of women's friend flab, the hump flab, the hum, etc. of the above H was tightly pushed back by hand, and the h's face was tried to be taken by drinking.

Accordingly, the above H attempted to arrest Defendant A as an offender in the act of interfering with the performance of official duties, and Defendant B, by hand, left the chest of the above H in order to prevent the arrest of the above offender in the act of committing the act of committing the crime. Defendant C, by hand, was handed down several arms of the above H.

In this process, Defendant A, during the safe period of mobilization with the above H, committed assault against police officers in the course of performing their duties, such as: (a) Defendant A’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police statement made in relation to H, I, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (the attachment of photographs by recording a portablephone or by cutting down images);

1. The Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Selection of penalty;