logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2018.07.24 2018고단497
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On November 11, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the Victim F (L, 27 years old) and the Victim’s male-child group at the victim’s end while working in front of the E cafeteria located in Ansan-si, A around 21:25 on November 11, 2017, when the Defendant flicked the Defendant’s head, flicking the Defendant’s head, flicking the Defendant’s head, and flicking the head.

B. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the above date, at the above time, where F was reported to F and 112, and was dispatched to the site, H was the Defendant, who was a police officer belonging to G District of the Police Station G District, and was called to the site;

씨 발 개새끼들. 짭새 새끼들. 너희 다 짤라 버린다.

Bada shall be discarded in any manner.

C. C. H. H. H. H’s flaps by hand, and assaulted H’s flaps twice by drinking.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. Defendant B’s defect in an attempt to arrest A as a current offender on the same grounds as what was described in paragraph 1, at the time, at the place, and on the inside and outside of the police station G District for the same reason as what was described in the same paragraph.

“In accordance with the body of the Republic of Korea, the body of the Republic of Korea committed assault, such as smuggling by putting H’s arms with his hand, booming the lock boomed by H.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers for arresting flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statements

1. Some of the statements made by the prosecution against the Defendants in the suspect interrogation protocol

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A victim statement of I and F;

1. A report on investigation (verification of female victims' conversations, etc. and on-site witnesses);

1. Data for verifying CCTV images for crime prevention, and the application of CCTV video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (a) and Article 136(1) (a) of the Criminal Act; Article 136(1) (a) of the Criminal Act; Article 136(2) of the Criminal Act; Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A who has aggravated concurrent crimes: Criminal Act.

arrow