1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 25, 2010, the Plaintiff, who was working as the head of the B police station investigation division, took a different 1,200m-in type, one of which was undergoing a physical fitness test, and received treatment at the police hospital due to the high right kne-free kne, and received treatment from the Defendant, the Plaintiff was subject to a decision to grant medical treatment for official duties until June 17, 2015.

B. After retirement on June 30, 2015, the Plaintiff asserted that the instant injury was caused by the instant injury to the Defendant, and the Defendant filed a claim for disability benefits on September 7, 2015, the Defendant determined the disability benefit site (hereinafter “instant disposition”) based on the opinion of the Public Officials Pension Benefit Deliberation Committee (hereinafter “instant disposition”), based on the opinion of the Public Officials Pension Benefit Deliberation Committee, the Plaintiff’s determination of disability benefit site (hereinafter “instant disposition”) is difficult to deem that the instant injury and disease took place on March 29, 201, despite the implementation of an anti-monthly fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoring surgery on March 29, 2011, and is also 125 degrees ( normal 150 degrees).

C. Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed a request for review with the Public Official Pension Benefit Review Committee. On November 11, 2015, the Public Official Pension Benefit Review Committee dismissed the Plaintiff’s request for review.

[Grounds for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 11 and 12 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff's right kne-free knee is removed, and the right knee is changed jointly into the right kne-free knee, and the right-hand bridge is shorter than the left-hand bridge, so the plaintiff has a playground, pedestrian disability, and the plaintiff has a pedestrian disability, and the operation of the surgery is conducted, and the constant right-hand sle is changed and the movement restriction is not possible.