beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On November 15, 2017, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “the escape certificate No. 3-4, No. 4-5,” the escape certificate No. 5-5, the escape certificate No. 4-5, and the escape certificate No. 4-5, the need-to-one, and the need-to-astronomical arrest certificate No. 5, and the need-to-astronomical arrest certificate No. 1 (hereinafter “the instant injury and disease”), and received medical care until November 3, 2018, with the Defendant’s approval from the occupational disease.
B. On November 6, 2018, the Plaintiff applied for disability benefits. On December 13, 2018, the Defendant rendered a disposition to the Plaintiff as class 11 of the disability grade (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that “the Plaintiff constitutes a person who has disability in light of Do’s skills.”
The detailed decision-making details are as follows:
[Basic Calculation] New Class 7 Nos. 11, 11, 7, 12, 16, 12, 16, or 16, or 16, or those who have suffered minor functional disorder in the scale of a ship (e.g., 4-5 No. 1), or those who have suffered minor functional disorder in the scale of a ship (e.g., 3-4-5, non-occupational surgery) [final calculation] those who have suffered minor operational disorder in the scale of a ship ship (e.g., 3-4);
C. The Plaintiff filed a petition for review against the instant disposition. However, in the case of the Plaintiff on May 13, 2019, it is reasonable to recognize only simple voltage since it does not fall under the case of need to be fixed in a stable state, as it clearly shows unstable symptoms due to electric shock. However, it is reasonable to recognize only a simple voltage since it does not fall under the case of need to be fixed in a stable state.
The grade of disability is recognized as the neutism of the latitude and longitude, and the grade of disability is the 11 degree of disability of the person who has a minor functional disorder in the leutism and is the remaining person of the leutism.
The plaintiff is confirmed to have an existing disability falling under class 12 of the disability grade by performing 3-4-5 surgery at a time due to personal reasons in 2012, and it is below the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act.