logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.05.17 2018구단54319
장해등급결정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff, while working as a building wooden hole for 19 years, caused physical force or inappropriate weight, applied for disability benefits to the Defendant on the ground that the instant injury and disease caused “peach of the said injury and disease,” on the ground that “Plag escape certificate (No. 2-3-4-5) , confiscing escape certificate (No. 4-5-67) , confiscing escape certificate (No. 4-5-7) , the right-hand satis, the right-hand satis, the right-hand satis, the right-hand satis, the left-hand satis, and the left-hand satising satise (including the two injury and disease),” following medical treatment approval from the Defendant by July 17, 2014.

In 10: Grade 8 [Persons whose area of physical disability is restricted by not less than 30% but less than 50% due to the malutism No. 4-5-6 of the Gyeongju] : Grade 11 or 7 [The persons whose area of physical disability is restricted by not less than 30% and less than 50%] : The person whose minor functional disability in the malutism remains (the person who performed a malutism in two or more spine parts due to the marization of the malute No. 3-4-5 of the Meakju, No. 4-5 of the Meakju, and who performed a malute operation at the same time due to the marcization of the malute period No. 4-5] : the remaining persons of Grade 9 (the mutatis mutandis application by the method of adjustment) - 500 degrees - 100 degrees - 400 degrees - 15 degrees - 150 degrees - 10000.

B. On August 11, 2017, the Defendant determined the Plaintiff’s disability grade to Grade 9 (hereinafter “instant disposition”), and the details of its specific decision are as follows.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 3, 5 evidence, Eul evidence 1 to 3 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion is the Plaintiff.

arrow