logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.07.05 2018고단2087
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, the Defendant treated the mixtures (i.e., a single philopon), such as Metepha (i.e., a single philopon; hereinafter “Blopon”) and carpets (i.e., a single philopon; hereinafter “Blopon”) as follows.

A. On March 4, 2018, the Defendant purchased and sold 180,000 won to D (E) on the street in Seosan-si, Seosan-si (hereinafter “E”), and sold 3,000 won on the basis of the fact.

2) On May 5, 2018, the Defendant purchased and sold 2.60,00 won to D on the street in Seosan-si around 19:38 on May 5, 2018.

3) On May 5, 2018, the Defendant purchased and sold 270,000 won from G at the house of G (one name “H”) located in Young-gun, Nam Young-gun, Nam-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “Seoul”), and purchased and sold 3 f0,000 won.

4) On May 10, 2018, the Defendant purchased and sold 240,000 won to D around 304, 15:11, Seosan-si International Building 304, and purchased and sold 4,000 won.

B. Around May 5, 2018, the Defendant administered bamera in a way that the Defendant 21:00, at the house of G located in Young-gun F, with a view to raising the 1st day of the bamera, and bamera caused by heating the bottom of the bamera.

2) On May 6, 2018, at around 00:00, the Defendant administered the drugs in the same manner as that of the foregoing G in the foregoing place.

2. Any foreigner violating the Immigration Control Act may sojourn in the Republic of Korea within the limits of his/her sojourn status and sojourn period.

The Defendant, as a foreigner of the Thailand’s nationality, entered the Republic of Korea as a visa exemption (B1) on June 19, 2014, and stayed in the Republic of Korea until September 17, 2014, notwithstanding the fact that he/she could reside in the Republic of Korea.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer in relation to G or D;

1. Accusation of an immigration offender;

1. Investigation report (the translation of suspect and accomplice G, 'E' and SNS hosting content for drug transactions) and investigation report (the calculation of additional collection charges);

1. Status of individual entry or departure;

1. A.

arrow