A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 1, 2019, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Drivers, Violence, etc.) was removed from the victim B (the age of 63) who was a taxi engineer from 121 furri or Sari-ro 16:24, on March 1, 2019, the Defendant was placed at the time when the victim’s face was lost.

After all, the Defendant assaulted the driver of a vehicle in operation.

2. On March 1, 2019, the Defendant was in front of the D funeral home located in Pyeongtaek-si, and the Defendant requested a police officer to answer personal information from the Defendant, such as paragraph (1), on the road in front of the D funeral home located in Pyeongtaek-si on March 1, 2019. On the other hand, the Defendant continued to see the chest part of the above police officer’s chest part one time on his/her hand, and was shaking the two arms of the above police officer by hand.

In the end, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of B’s written laws and regulations;

1. Article 5-10 (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant in the suspended sentence of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act assaults the driver and commits violence against the police officer in uniform.

The fact that the damaged police officer did not take a straw is also disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, the defendant's mistake is recognized, and the defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case in the state of detention, the fact that the injured driver and the injured driver have agreed smoothly, and other matters concerning the defendant's age, character, character, environment, and crime.