A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 17, 2020, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment and 2 years of suspended execution due to interference with the execution of official duties in the branch court of the Daegu District Court on September 17, 202, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 25, 2020.

1. On September 10, 2020, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol on the roads located in Daegu-gu, Seogu, Daegu-gu (hereinafter “Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes”); (b) went on the back seat of the E-si operated by the victim D ( South, the age of 62); and (c) went to the victim as a four-distance distance from North fugitives located in the Seogu, Seogu, Seoul-gu Scattering-dong; and (d) thereafter, on September 10, 2020, the Defendant attempted to put the said taxi into the said taxi without paying the said fees to the victim when the said taxi passes through the Daegu-gu F-dong road; and (c) the injured person attempted to get out of the taxi without paying the said taxi charges to the Defendant “the customer, 4,000 won of the fare”.

“At the time of approximately two to three times the back of the victim’s drinking without any reason.”

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the driver of a vehicle in operation.

2. On September 10, 2020, the Defendant: (a) was arrested as a flagrant offender and parked in the air for escort to a police officer dispatched to the scene after receiving a report from 112 that the Defendant assaulted D on September 10, 202; and (b) was arrested as a flagrant offender and parked in the said place in the air for escort.

G Also, while walking the upper right side of the patrol car No. 2, it was damaged to have the 809,000 won of the repair cost, such as the exchange of the front gate on the right side.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the use of goods by public offices, thereby harming their utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written estimate to report the investigation of the police statement statement (related to the confirmation of the taxi boom, etc.) with D;

1. Previous convictions: Inquiry about criminal history and application of Acts and subordinate statutes (the confirmation of concurrent crimes after Article 37 of the Criminal Act);

1. Article 5-10(1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the occupation of a driver's assault) and Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act (damage to public goods) against criminal facts.