1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2.The primary claims extended by this Court and the ancillary claims added by this Court.

1. The reasons why the court of this case cited in the judgment of the court of first instance are identical to the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for cases of cutting down or adding as follows, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

▣ 제1심판결문 제2면 제7, 8행 중 “‘C 시리즈 헬멧‘과 ’D 제품‘을 구매하되” "주식회사 H의 ‘C 시리즈 헬멧‘과 ’주식회사 L의 ‘D 의류 등 제품'을 구매하되” ▣ 제1심판결문 제3면 제19행 중 “의사를 표명하였다

“Expression of intention” was expressed.

In addition, the above I sent text messages to the Defendant, such as “G’s continuous loss in the stock market is impossible to sell and operate normally in the Republic of Korea due to its sales,” “G is difficult to maintain its business because it is difficult for us to keep the business,” and “the owner who takes an even number of G slaughter,” etc. Accordingly, the Defendant raised an objection against the discount event of K as described in paragraph (e) below, and demanded the Defendant to transfer the exclusive sales right to the premium products among the helvers.

” ▣ 제1심판결문 제4면 제10행 중 “2. 주장 및 판단” “2. 주위적 청구에 관하여” ▣ 제1심판결문 제4면 제14, 15행 중 “위 헬멧을 원고에게 공급할 채무를 이행할 수 없게 되었다.

“The Defendant was unable to perform its obligation to supply the above he had become unable to be supplied with the goods any longer by exercising power to force L Co., Ltd. to suspend the sale of the said D products (such as clothes) to L Co., Ltd.

” ▣ 제1심판결문 제5면 제6, 7, 8행 중 “피고의 귀책사유로 인한 것이라고 볼 수 없다.

Therefore, the plaintiff cannot rescind the contract of this case for reasons of the defendant's impossibility of performance due to reasons attributable to the plaintiff. Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

"Defendant".