beta
Text
Defendant
A A A Fine of 40,000,000 won, Defendant B of 30,000,000 won, Defendant C of 15,000,000 won, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On April 9, 2015, Defendant A promised Defendant A’s violation of the Act on the Protection of Children’s Juveniles from Sexual Abuse (i.e., purchase of sex) to offer “K” to a juvenile who became aware of through “K” at around 10:15 Chungcheong-si, Chungcheongnam-si, as well as “the age of 15)” and “the age of 15 years and the so-called “nive to have a sexual intercourse with money,” and subsequently, Defendant A committed an act of purchasing the child’s sexual intercourse at least six times in total, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table, from that time, including one hundred thousand won and one sex relationship with the said L.
2. Violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (the purchase, etc. of sex) by Defendant B;
A. On June 3, 2015, at around 17:00, the Defendant promised to offer L(n, 15 years old) and so-called “limited to the conditions” to a youth who became aware of through “K,” a smartphone, at around 17:00, the Defendant purchased a child’s sexual intercourse with the said L(150,000 won.
B. At around 17:00 of the same month, the Defendant promised to make O (here, 16 years of age) a juvenile who became aware of as the introduction of the above L and the 150,000 won and 150,000 won a single sex relationship with the aboveO to purchase the child’s sex.
3. Defendant C’s violation of the Act on the Protection of Children’s Juveniles from Sexual Abuse (such as purchase of sex), committed an act of buying a child’s sexual intercourse with the said L by promising Defendant C to promise L (V, 15 years old) as a juvenile who became aware of through “K” at around 18:15 on June 14, 2015, at around 18:15, Defendant C’s sexual intercourse with the said L (100,000 won) to keep the juvenile’s sexual intercourse.
4. Violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as arranging sexual traffic in Defendant D;
A. On May 2015, the Defendant: (a) was aware of the fact that Habel No. 1 et al., as described in paragraph (1) of the Habel 2015 through Jphone No. Habel K, and “Y only 16 years of age”) and “K only”.