logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.05.09 2018고합28
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(성매수등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, who became aware of the “C” smartphone c, had a mind to see the victim D (tentative name, mar, 15 years old) and her inner name as “other than the conditions”.

1. On October 2017, the Defendant: (a) had sexual intercourse with the victim, who is a juvenile under 15 years of age, parked on the road in the eM5 car owned by the Defendant, which was parked on the roads of the eM5-car, for the first time, and paid 50,000 won in cash in return, to purchase the sex of the juvenile.

2. On October 18, 2017, the Defendant: (a) on October 18, 2017, around Fcheon-si, on his own possession, had sexual intercourse with the victim, who is a juvenile under 15 years of age, and paid 50,000 won in cash in return for the sexual intercourse with the victim, who is a juvenile under 15 years of age; and (b) had the juvenile purchase the sex.

3. On October 21, 2017, the Defendant: (a) on October 21, 2017, on the 19:05 official week, entered into a sexual relationship with the victim, who is a juvenile under 15 years of age, who was parked in Fcheon, and paid 30,000 won in cash in return, thereby purchasing the sex of juveniles.

4. On October 29, 2017, the Defendant: (a) on October 29, 2017, on his own, parked in Fcheon at Fcheon-si; (b) had sexual intercourse with the victim under 15 years of age with the victim who is a juvenile under 15 years of age; and (c) paid 30,000 won in cash in return, to purchase the sex of juveniles.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. G dialogue content;

1. Determination as to the defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion of internal investigation (in case of sexual traffic)

1. The gist of the argument is that the defendant merely made a sex relationship by mutual consent with the victim, and there is no fact that he made a sex relationship with the victim by promising the victim to make a compensation in advance, and only the amount paid to the victim is the amount of money

The defendant did not have the victim's sex.

2. Determination

A. Article 1 of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse provides that “The purpose of this Act is to protect children from sexual crimes and to enable children to grow as healthy members of society.”

arrow