logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.08.22 2012고합507
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(영리약취ㆍ유인등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for nine years.

The defendant's disclosure of information to the public shall be made through an information and communications network for ten years.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On January 28, 2010, the Gwangju High Court sentenced the defendant to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. (for the purpose of abduction and inducement of profit), and completed the execution of the sentence in the Southern Prison on December 24, 201.

【Criminal Facts】

"2012, 507"

1. On August 8, 2012, the Defendant: (a) informed of the fact that there was no place where the victim D (the age of 13) was released from the “Nettodo”, which was known at the Internet hosting site; (b) induced the victim D to arrange commercial sex acts through a tentatively named “term met” to arrange commercial sex acts; and (c) had the victim D to acquire commercial sex acts in return for the said commercial sex acts.

On the same day, the Defendant, along with the Defendant’s daily activities E (n.e., 16 years of age), solicited the Defendant to engage in commercial sex acts with the Victim D and his daily activities at a high-speed bus terminal located in Gwangju-dong, Seo-gu, Gwangju-gu, to “We are not travelling along with E.e., terms and conditions. I want to ask for money in full. I wish to collect money in full with the condition.” From around that time to September 5, 2012, the Defendant moved the Victim D to a motherel where the trade name at the Busan-gu, Daejeon, Busan-gu, Busan-si, the Busan-si, the Busan-si, the Busan-si, the Simcheon-si, the Simsan-si, and the victim D was unable to know the name of the victim D, and had the victim D engage in commercial sex acts through “condition-nam” against men who cannot know the name of the victim D.

Accordingly, the defendant enticed the victim D for profit-making purpose.

2. Around August 8, 2012, the Defendant violated the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse ( forced act, etc.) was urged the victim D to engage in sexual traffic through “conditionon” and went together to the victim D to engage in sexual traffic. Around August 12, 2012, in collusion with F, the Defendant cannot identify the victim D’s name with the Internet hosting at the mother telecom where the trade name in Incheon cannot be known at around 19:29 on August 12, 2012.

arrow