logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.08.27 2015고단2490
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 9, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc. at the Gwangju District Court on July 11, 2007, and a fine of five million won in the same court on July 11, 2007, and on August 13, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act by the same court on August 21, 2014.

On September 1, 2014, the Defendant, along with C, has gathered to operate a game room by installing a massage game machine, which is a game product not classified in Gwangju Dong-gu D and the first underground level, and exchanged it to customers. From September 15, 2014 to October 1, 2014, C purchased 20 games in the above game room, and installs a book and CCTV and other equipment, and the Defendant, by inducing customers, lent money to the game room for expenses for the game, while purchasing necessary equipment in the game room, such as tobacco, simplified, etc., and E was charged with the instant case, and E was sentenced to imprisonment for six months, confiscation, and additional collection, etc., and the appellate court (Seoul District Court 2015No716, Jul. 16, 2015) was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor, and became final and conclusive as it is.

B After employing E, E inform E of the work to be done in the game place, such as the operating method of the game machine, exchange method, customer response method, etc., as the Defendant informed, E provided the service to an employee in the game place, and provided the service to the customer, and exchanged the points that the customer received through the game at a rate of 10,000 points per 1,00 points.

As a result, the defendant provided unspecified customers with game products not classified in collusion with C and E, and exchanged the results obtained through the above game products by customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.

arrow