A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On November 16, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry at the Seoul Southern District Court on June, 2009, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 24, 2009.

1. The Defendant, along with C and D, operated a game room in the building E of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government. At the same time, the Defendant invested in his/her game machine, and at the same time, C shall exercise overall control over its operation, and C shall invest lease deposit, and D shall exercise overall control over the operation of the actual game room with the Defendant while managing its employees, such as F, in the game room, and F shall be an employee.

From November 27, 2008 to February 4, 2009, the Defendant in violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act installed 38 game equipment in total, including 19 game equipment and 19 game equipment for “marine camping machine” and 19 game equipment, which were not rated by the Game Rating Board in the above game site, provided the above game product to unspecified customers for use, and exchanged the said product in cash after deducting 10% commission fee according to the above points if customers obtain certain points after they performed the game using the above game machine.

As a result, the defendant provided game products not classified in collusion with C, D, and F for use by customers, and exchanged the results obtained through the use of game products for business purposes.

B. On November 2008, the Defendant: (a) lent F a lease contract in the name of F in the above game room to F; (b) however, if the police control over the police, the Defendant stated that D is a real business owner; (c) talks about us; (d) a fine is granted on behalf of us; and (e) an attorney-at-law is appointed in lieu of a fine; and (c) there is no criminal record. On detention, the Defendant stated that 5 million won will be additionally imposed after the F’s consent, and completed the lease contract in its name with the F’s consent, and made the F make a false statement at the investigative agency.