logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.10.04 2013고정4125
일반교통방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

B From June 16, 2012, from around 14:05, the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council held the “Fresh 2-day 1st century,” the “Fresh 1st 2th Embling” at the Gando Culture Emba-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul.

After the completion of the above assembly, the number of 1,50 participants in the assembly started from the first door of the Ethical city culture, and they moved from the Ethical city to the Ethical airspace through the airspace through the subway station, as they were cut off by the career in the future in LGur Buildings.

At around 16:19 on the same day, the Defendant 1,00 participants in other assemblies, which are gathered in the Chungcheong basin, and went into the jurisdiction of the office of Seoul Metropolitan Government, and went into the jurisdiction of the office of the Seoul Metropolitan Government while moving into three lanes in front of the direction of proceeding, and thereby hindering the traffic of vehicles by driving into the jurisdiction of the office of Seoul Metropolitan Government through a central library.

Accordingly, the defendant conspired with other participants in the assembly and interfered with the traffic by land.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on internal investigation (the details as to whether the report was submitted on June 16, 2012), as well as whether it was accompanied by evidentiary documents, photographs, files and roadways;

1. Evidentiary materials (a right, 56 through 65 pages of investigation records);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as continuous reporting of the situation (of title 2, title 92 to 128 of investigation records);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 185 and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow