logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2015.04.17 2015고단141
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Performance of official duties;

A. At around 23:50 on January 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) stated that “D” in the name of “D” in the instant restaurant C is in front of a restaurant; (b) the Defendant was asked of the Defendant’s personal information, etc. from the slopeF affiliated with the Hacheon Police Station Edistrict, which was called by the Defendant upon receiving a report of violent case in relation to the suspicion of the said restaurant customer’s clock; and (c) stated that “Is the Defendant’s personal information, etc., of the Defendant, who was sent to the said F, “Is the police officer, Is the sewage in the sewage Gu, Is off, Is the instant F’s buck, and walk the said F’s bucks once, thereby hindering the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the suppression of and investigation into the crime.”

B. Around 00:00 on January 3, 2015, the Defendant: (a) arrested the flagrant offender of the instant district at the entrance of the Net Police Station E District; (b) was arrested as the flagrant offender of the instant district, and was in the course of opening the said district office, and assaulted one time to walking her tamp with the developments leading up to the said district unit, thereby hindering the police officers from performing their legitimate duties concerning the suppression and investigation of police officers’ crimes.

2. On January 2, 2015, at around 23:50 on January 2, 2015, the Defendant insultd the victim H by publicly alleging that “A” in front of a restaurant in the name of “D” in the instant restaurant, the proprietor of the said restaurant, the customer, and a number of players who had been on the said road, are heard, and the victim H, who is the circumstances leading to the instant E district unit in the net Police Station E district, is the offender.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to H and F;

1. Photographs of the victim;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing performance of official duties) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution ( normal consideration of the reasons for the suspension of execution);

1. Order of community service;

arrow