A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Although the Defendant did not actually intend to establish and operate a company, the Defendant, in collusion with the “C” on the solicitation of the French passbook, established and registered the tentatively named “C”, opened an account in the name of the juristic person by using it, created the passbook and cash card, which is an access medium connected to the said account, and supplied it to the said “C”, and the “C” on the solicitation of the French passbook, which was called the “C”, intended to collect the passbook from the Defendant, etc. and sell it to the lusent criminal organization in which singing, lending, fraud, illegal sports discussions, etc. are conducted.

1. On December 22, 2014, the Defendant conspireded to enter false records, such as public electronic records, and to accompany the company, and prepared a false application for registration of incorporation of the company and filed an application for registration of the company with a public official in charge of registration of the company in charge of registration of the company in Incheon District Court, which was located in 17 Doo-ro 163, Nam-gu, Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, but did not pay corporate capital, and did not establish a corporate office.

A public official in charge of the above registration, who is unaware of such circumstance, shall enter the electronic register so that the registration of incorporation of a limited company D can be completed in the electronic register of the corporation, and the said public official kept the electronic register of the said corporation that recorded false facts as above.

As a result, the Defendant conspired with the “C” book for solicitation of the French passbook, and made a false report to a public official to record false facts in the corporate registry of the same electronic records as the original copy of the process deed, and made it available on the same day by making it available on the corporate registry. On the same day, the Defendant continued to make a false report to a public official twice in total, such as the previous list of crimes (1) in the same manner, and had him record false facts in the corporate registry of the same electronic records as the original copy of the deed, and exercised it.

2. Violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act;