beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.
However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal records] Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a year of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act in the support for the development of the Sugwon method, on April 5, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 13, 2016.
[Criminal facts]
1. The Defendant: (a) established a company and registered a so-called “deficial corporation” in collusion with E, F, and H for solicitation books, B, G, and H; (b) opened an account in the name of the company; (c) made the passbook and cash card connected to the account; and (d) supplied it to the person soliciting the passbook; (c) opened the passbook and cash card in the name of the Defendant or the person holding the name of the company; and (d) recruited to sell it to the non-criminal organization that opened the passbook and cash card in the name of the Defendant or the person holding the name of the company.
A. On April 16, 2014, the Defendant conspiredd to do so, such as a false entry into a public electronic record, and a false public electronic record, and filed an application for registration of incorporation with a public official in charge of registration under the name of the corporation, who was a director of the Seoul Central District Court registered in the registry office of the Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul District Court, located in 14-gil3-3-gil, a corporation did not pay the corporation capital, and a corporation office was not established.
A public official in charge of the above registration, who is unaware of such circumstance, shall enter the electronic register so that the registration of the establishment of the “A” corporation is completed in the corporate register, and the said corporate register shall be kept in the electronic register of the corporation.
Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the nominal person B, G, H, and the public official E and F, who are responsible for the solicitation of passbooks, made a false report to the public official, and made it recorded false facts in the corporate register, which is the same electronic record as the original copy of the process certificate, and made it available by making it available on the computerized register of the juristic person.