A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On June 16, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act in the support of the Daejeon District Court, and two years of suspension of execution was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, and the above judgment was finalized on June 24, 2017.

[2] The Defendant: (a) established a company in collusion with the company’s solicitation books, such as C and D; (b) established a nominal account in collusion with the company’s solicitation books; (c) opened an account in the name of the corporation; and (d) created a passbook and cash card, which is an access medium connected to the account; and (c) supplied the company’s solicitation books, such as C, etc. to the above one; and (d) solicited the Defendant to sell them to the non-criminal organization, such as singing, lending, fraud, and illegal sports discussions.

1. On September 24, 2014, the Defendant conspiredd as above, in collusion, to prepare a false application for registration of a juristic person with no intent to establish and operate the juristic person as a director of the Seoul Central District Court, a registry office of the Seoul Central District Court, a registry office of the Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul District Court, a registry office of the juristic person, and a registry office of the juristic person, etc., and filed an application for registration of the juristic person with no intention to establish and operate the juristic person.

A public official in charge of the above registration, who is unaware of such circumstance, shall enter the computer system in order to complete the registration of the establishment of “E” in the corporate registry, and keep the said corporate registry in which the aforementioned false fact is recorded.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with the invitation books C, D, etc. for the public official, made a false report to record false facts on the corporate registry of the same electronic records as the original copy of the fair deed, and used it on the corporate registry by having the public official keep it on the electronic register of the juristic person. In addition, from around that time to January 15, 2015, the Defendant is in total as shown in the attached list (1) in the same manner.