1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of this court, such as the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance, is as follows, and the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows, and the plaintiff's assertion and its judgment are added as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of "the plaintiff's assertion and its judgment" as stated in the following 2. Thus, it is acceptable as it

Part 7 1-2 of the Schedule to Section 10, 1-2, adding “this Agreement, unless otherwise specified” to “including paper numbers” following the following:

(b) (Minority)

(3) At the 10th 8th 8th 7th 10th 8th ", comprehensively, the Plaintiff's evidence and certificate of transfer, are insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff agreed to distribute 30% of the proceeds from the operation of the hospital of this case to the Dolim Design until the building of this case is sold, there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Rather, there is no evidence to acknowledge it, from the preceding 3th 4th 11th 3th 4th 11th 11th to "............. the portion recovered with the title of execution by the judgment of this case.......... the 3th 1th 1th 1th 1th 2th 2th 2th 12, 15, 16th 17th 17th 2th 2th 200 "the 15th 10th 5th 10th 10th 2th 2th 7th 3th 3th 5th 2th '.'.'.'.'.'.'.'

2. The plaintiffs' assertion and decision in this court

A. As to the assertion regarding the purpose of “avoking to maximize mutual interests” under Article 1 of the instant arrangement, the Plaintiffs proposed to the Defendant only for the purpose of settling the claim for construction price regarding the instant building with respect to the first broadband design, and the two-day mutual aid system, and accordingly, the broadband design will pay a certain amount every month.