logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.08.26 2019누60181
참여제한처분 등 취소
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Acknowledgement of the first instance judgment

A. The reasons why the court stated in this case are as follows.

Except for amendments to the judgment of the first instance as prescribed in paragraph (1), the same shall apply to the judgment of the first instance.

The relevant portion shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. 1) Under the table 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "Witness AH" of the second instance is all "AH of the first instance trial" under the table 10, 6, 11, 3 through (4), 12, 8, 15, 8 under the table 11. 2) The "the instant task" of the judgment of the court of first instance is "the instant task" of the first instance, 6, 16, 16. 2) The "the instant task" is "the instant task or the detailed task (the title of the task: AI) and 3 (the title of the task) planned and implemented for the instant task or for a single research purpose."

3) The following is added between the 18th page 3 and 4 of the first instance judgment. The Plaintiff asserts to the effect that since the instant task was focused on U’s concept and conceptual design, the lack of security security of the system that should be considered in the development stage of software program, lack of access to data and UI/UX standardization, lack of access to software (SW) engineering, failure of information strategic plans (ISO) reports, etc., cannot be a proper reason to deny the prosperity of the instant task.

However, the task of this case is not only the concept and concept design of construction knowledge and information hub, but also the development of partial sprinks and the development of prototypes that can operate the test (No. 13, No. 10, No. 21). ② The task of this case is, beyond the collection, classification, and provision of information, to create and provide customized knowledge to consumers in excess of the existing collection, classification, and provision of information, as it presents a plan for differentiation between existing research and development (No. 2, No. 11, No. 11, No. 13, No. 12), and it is customized to consumers by processing and analyzing not only the preparation and provision of research or analysis reports through human resources, but also the collected data.

arrow