logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.10.06 2016나2034692
구상금
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court concerning this case, such as the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance, is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the relevant part is used as follows 2. Thus, it is citing it as it is by the main sentence of Article 420

2. Parts to be dried;

(a) modify “A taxi” of 3 pages 1 to “K si”;

(b) modify each “automobile damage insurance contract” of three pages 2 and 10 pages 3 to each “mutual aid agreement.”

(c) modify each “fourth-lane” of the five and six lanes below to each “four-lane”;

(d) revise each “interest for delay” of up to five pages below 2 and 6 below to each “damage for delay.”

(e) revise “not less than 70 per cent” below on the six pages to “not less than 50 per cent of fish”.

(f) revise “in accordance with the fourth line, other than the first one,” of the 8th 15th 16 parallels as “in proportion to four lanes, other than the first one.”

(g) by modifying “B-1” to “B” for the following two pages:

(h) by striking nine to nine to nine to nine to nine.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified within the extent of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are without merit.

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow