logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2012.10.26 2011가합84712
하자보수금 등
Text

1. For the Plaintiffs (excluding Plaintiffs A and B) and the Intervenor’s successor as indicated in the Plaintiffs’ List:

A. Defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The remaining plaintiffs except the plaintiffs A and B and the plaintiff succeeding intervenors (hereinafter referred to as "the aforementioned plaintiffs and the plaintiff succeeding intervenors") are referred to as "the plaintiffs."

) The 400 units, Dong 4, Dong 400 (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

A) A sectional owner of the apartment of this case is the business entity that sold the apartment of this case, and the defendant Dae forest industry is the company that constructed the apartment of this case after being awarded a contract for the new construction of the apartment of this case. (2) as the location of the apartment of this case, Gangnam-si is the authority to conduct the inspection for the use of the apartment of this case.

B. The apartment of this case was inspected on November 29, 2006, including the usage inspection of the apartment of this case and the occurrence of defects.

However, the defendant Grand Forest Industry failed to construct the apartment of this case in accordance with the design drawings, or modified the construction differently from the defective construction or design drawings.

The sectional owners of the apartment of this case and the council of occupants' representatives of the apartment of this case have continuously requested the defendant Grand Forest industry to repair the defects.

Accordingly, the defendant Grand Forest Industry performed the repair work for some defects.

Nevertheless, the apartment of this case still remains a defect such as the sum table of repair cost by the period of defect repair liability, and in order to repair the apartment of this case, the following expenses are required in the same amount as indicated in [Attachment 2] under the premise that the apartment of this case is "part-down design" after the crack of the outer wall

[Attachment 2] 15,058,258,258,569,982 98,133,993, 65,45,451,744,510,51039,048,3424,210,536, 422, 536, 422,680,71,680,7196,8794,782,6921,670,670,5891,928,928,1050,70,70,70,940,945 aggregate of 19,866,8686,106,1068,475,4636,475,6386,47,475,765,636,47,765,765,782,47,6365

(c) The size of oil reserved;

arrow