beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant Daelim Industry Co., Ltd.: KRW 1,217,536,233 and its related thereto from March 21, 2015 to November 20, 2015.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. 1) The Plaintiff is the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju (hereinafter “instant apartment”).
(2) In order to manage the 1,096 households of 25 units, the Defendant Grand Forest Industry is an autonomous management organization organized by the occupants. (2) The Defendant Grand Forest Industry is a contractor and a contractor of the instant apartment, and the instant apartment is 2010.
1. 19. Completion of the inspection of use;
The warranty period of 1732,816,050 up to 19 January 19, 201 to 21,832,040,126 from January 19, 201 to January 18, 201, to 31,465,632,10 until January 18, 201 to 31,465,632, and 100 to 41,09,224,076 to 2010 to 34. The head of the Gu of Gwangju (the warranty warranty period of this case between 19,000 to 18,000,000 to 18,000,000 to 10,000,000 to 20,000,000,000 to 18,000,000;
(B) After concluding a warranty and being issued a warranty, the guaranty creditor of the instant warranty contract, composed of the Plaintiff, was changed from the head of Seo-gu in Gwangju to the Plaintiff. (B) The Defendant Daelim Industry, while performing a new construction work of the instant apartment, did not perform the construction work, did not perform the construction work in accordance with the design drawing, or performed the construction work in a defective manner, or changed differently from the design drawing, thereby causing a defect to the section for common use and section for exclusive use of the instant apartment. Accordingly, the instant apartment has caused an obstacle to the function, aesthetic, and safety in the instant apartment.
2) As a result, the Plaintiff requested for the repair of the apartment in this case from the date of conversion for sale in lots. However, there still remains any defect in the section for common use and section for exclusive use of the apartment in this case. Meanwhile, among the total 1,096 households of the apartment in this case, only one of the two co-owners shall claim against the Plaintiff in the case of attached Table 3, 113, 1103, and 39.5, 1103.