logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.12.09 2016구합66599
정보공개거부처분취소
Text

1. On June 17, 2016, the information listed in the attached Table 1 list among the dispositions rejecting the disclosure of information that the Defendant rendered to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. On June 7, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a request with the Defendant for disclosure of information listed in the separate sheet No. 1, but the Defendant rejected the disclosure on June 17, 2016 on the ground that the information the Plaintiff requested to disclose was information under Article 9 of the Act on External Audit of Stock Companies (hereinafter “ External Audit Act”) and constitutes information under Article 9(1)1 (information provided for in other Acts as confidential information), 4 (information related to a pending trial), 5 (information in the process of decision-making or internal review), and 6 (personally related matters) of the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”).

(hereinafter referred to as the "disposition of this case", and the remaining information except the information listed in the separate sheet 2 excluded from disclosure among the information listed in the separate sheet 1 in the separate sheet 1 is referred to as the "information of this case"). / [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, entry (including the provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply) in the evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The proviso of Article 9(1)1 of the Information Disclosure Act and the proviso of Article 9(1)1 of the Act on External Audit under Article 9 of the Act on External Audit may not be disclosed “information specified as confidential or confidential by any other Act or any order (limited to Presidential Decree or Ordinance of the National Assembly Regulations, which is delegated by other Acts or subordinate statutes).”

At this time, “information prescribed as confidential or non-disclosure by other Acts or orders delegated by other Acts” shall be the content of the information disclosure subject to and scope of the information disclosure, procedures for information disclosure, information subject to non-disclosure, etc. delegated by other Acts or subordinate statutes, unlike the Information Disclosure Act.

(see Supreme Court Decision 2012Du17384, Apr. 10, 2014). Meanwhile, Article 9 of the External Audit Act provides that any of the following persons shall perform his/her duties:

arrow