logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.07.18 2014고단807
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 16, 2014, at around 23:40, the Defendant, at the main point of the trade name “C,” “C” located in B at PYA on May 16, 2014, when drinking alcohol and failing to pay the drinking value, and upon receiving a report from D, the said main point, the Defendant called to the site and recommended the Defendant to pay the drinking value, but the Defendant did not pay the drinking value. On May 17, 2014, the Defendant did not pay the drinking value. At around 0:10 on May 17, 2014, the Defendant called to the F of F of F of the E public Security Center at PSA and F of G, which are the main points of the said week. However, the Defendant did not pay the drinking value because he did not pay the drinking value.

On May 17, 2014, around 00:28, the Defendant was urged by the K K to leave the patrol car in front of the said HH security center. Without any reason, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant, without any reason, on the part of the BH center’s security center’s security center’s security room’s explanation, that “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am at the left part of the said L, with the intention of “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties concerning the prevention, suppression, investigation, etc. of the above police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police concerning L;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (to listen to a speech collection business, telephone statement, or hearing report);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, in view of the following: (a) although the nature of the offense does not seem to be light in light of the Defendant’s criminal reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; (b) the Defendant’s violation of the instant crime; (c) there is no same kind of violent crime; and (d) the degree

arrow