Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. Definite Defendant was dispatched to the 112 report that he did not pay the drinking value within the D amusement station located in C on June 27, 2015 at around 00:10 on June 27, 2015, and was dispatched to the 112 report, the victims of the on-site dispatch, and why he did not pay the drinking value to the Defendant.

“Along with the foregoing defect alcohol, she publicly insulting the victims by openly insulting her at the place where she had employees H, etc. of the above entertainment shop, “When you find out why she had a son’s son, she would be unable to calculate the drinking value, but she would have expressed her son’s desire to be inside and the drinking value.”

B. Around 00:15 on June 27, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties and dealt with the instant case after receiving a report within the said entertainment center. The Defendant “drawing the Defendant without paying the drinking value.”

“Along with the breath of alcohol, the breath of the f, the breath of the f, the breath of the f, the breath of the f, and the breath of the f.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the handling of the case.

(c)

On June 27, 2015, around 02:25, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices by breaking one monitor on the market price, which is located on the books of the above global group, while taking a desire to “the brush with brush” among the fact that the Defendant was arrested in a fluorial police station Earb in Fluore C and was in the influence of alcohol in the earth and having a brushed in the earth.

2. On June 27, 2015, around 00:20, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant Company A, a partner company of the Defendant’s company, who was arrested and carried out flagrant offender under the foregoing G by the said G, and went to the 112 patrols to the said G so that he would not go to the 112 patrols, thereby leading to the 112 patrols.

Accordingly, the defendant is justified in arresting a flagrant offender by police officers.