The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On October 22, 2016, at around 00:05, the summary of the facts charged, the police officer E and F, who was employed by the Police Station D police station D police box, was dispatched to the police station after receiving a report of alcohol value 112 and confirmed the facts against H and I against the reported person and G, other than the person who was dispatched to the police station after hearing the report circumstances, etc.

However, without any reason, the Defendant sent the drinking value to the above H and I without any reason. This son, “I expressed the view that I had the above I’s eye with her finger while her h’s bath.”

Accordingly, four police officers, including the police officer E, proposed that “I am Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha, who is not related to the instant report,” from that time, Defendant E and F Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Hah Ha Ha Ha

Chewing h. Bags h. Bags h. Bags

Doz.

"Publicly insulting victims by taking a bath that is not likely to enter a large scale of interest, such as others."

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

(b) An offense subject to prosecution upon complaint: Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act.

C. On November 4, 2016, after the prosecution of this case, submission of a written withdrawal of complaint

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act;