The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, 2014 Highest 1024.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair punishment) of the original judgment (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Ex officio determination

A. On April 23, 2013, the summary of the charges of violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Crimes of Domestic Violence listed in Table 2 No. 1024, No. 28 and 29, the Defendant issued an ad hoc protective order to the effect that “the Defendant shall not transmit codes, phrases, sound, or images by wire, wireless, optical, optical, or other electronic means with the victim’s residence and place of work within 100 meters, or with the victim’s handphone or e-mail address,” and that “the Defendant did not lawfully obtain access from the victim and place of work within 100 meters until May 10, 2014” from the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court No. 2013, Nov. 11, 2013, the lower court did not lawfully obtain a victim’s cell phone or e-mail address within 100 meters from the victim’s residence and place of work until 20,014.

On June 9, 2013, along with the sending statement "," the victim's cell phone from June 9, 2013 (the date of June 8, 2013 appears to be written in writing) 17:51 "02-158-3112" on the same day and 17:51 "02-158-312" on the same day, and 18:46 "N" on the same day [No. 5 of the Evidence No. 2014 Highest 1024, No. 524 (Evidence 35 of the Evidence No. 1024), and 2 of the police in the book in which the victim's telephone details received from the defendant are recorded.