A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was divorced from the victim B (n, 40 years of age).

On March 28, 2018, the Defendant was issued a victim protective order ( Daejeon Family Court 2017da89) with the content that “the Defendant shall not access 100 meters or less from the victim’s residence or workplace until September 27, 2018).” On June 20, 2018, the Daejeon Family Court issued a victim protective order (the Daejeon Family Court 2017da89) with the content that “no access is made within 100 meters or less from the victim’s residence or workplace until December 20, 2018.” By December 20, 2018, the Defendant issued a victim protective order with the content that “no access is transmitted by the victim’s personal phone or e-mail address using the victim’s Handphone or e-mail address.”

In addition, on November 19, 2018, the Defendant was issued a protective order extension decision (2018 House 11) with respect to the offender by December 20, 2018 and the prohibition of access to telecommunications using until February 19, 2019. The Defendant was issued a protective order extension decision (2018 House 11) with respect to the offender at the Daejeon Family Court by January 18, 2019, “the access prohibition order was extended by April 19, 2019; the access prohibition order was extended by April 19, 2019; the court issued a protective order extension decision (201 House 11); and the court issued a protective order to change the residence and domicile of the workplace subject to the prohibition of access by the Daejeon Family Court by April 19, 2019.”

Therefore, the Defendant should not use telecommunications to the victim according to the above victim protective order.