logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 07. 26. 선고 2018두40720 판결
(심리불속행)[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2017Nu59767 (22 March 22, 2018)

Title

(Resceptic Conduct)

Summary

Since the subject of investment and calculation of the shares of this case is KimA, etc. and KimA, etc. are the substantial shareholders, and the fact that there was an agreement on title trust between the plaintiffs, the nominal shareholders, KimA, etc. is also the plaintiffs, each of the dispositions of this case that the plaintiffs deemed to have donated the shares of this case by KimA, etc. under Article 45-2 of the former Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act is legitimate.

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the appellant's grounds of appeal fall under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, all of the appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

Related statutes

Donation of title trust under Article 45-2 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act

arrow