beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for eight months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won.
Defendant
B The above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B On October 2, 2014, the Daegu District Court sentenced imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry to the 8th anniversary of the suspension of execution on October 11, 2014, which became final and conclusive on October 2014.
The Defendants offered game products that are different from the classified game products for use by customers, and recruited to exchange premiums obtained by customers using game products by operating C ("D") staff, a name-free winner ("E chief"), and a name-free exchange and game room.
Accordingly, from April 1, 2014 to April 14 of the same month, C changed the acquisition scores of physical skills appearing in the game differently from the contents classified in the Daegu Dong-gu F and the second floor "G", and provided 40 games that were changed to be operated by external storage device to make customers available for use, and managed employment management of the head of the business division, etc., Defendant A, as the president of the Hanba branch, was investigated as being unemployed in lieu of the suspect at the time of regulating the above game site by registering the above game site in his name, and Defendant B and the name poor winner (the "E head") managed the business books while managing the customers in the game site, and purchased free chips from money exchange when carrying free chips in the game machine, and the name poors were exchanged based on the items card obtained by customers in the above game site 4 and 500 won per 1,500 won per 1, 500 won per money.
As a result, the Defendants conspired with C, etc., provided customers with contents different from the contents of the rating classification, and provided customers with a job of exchanging tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of the game.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants
1. The prosecutor's statement concerning the defendant B 1.