1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

2. Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that this shall not apply.

Punishment of the crime

On July 4, 2013, Defendant A was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Eastern District Court on July 4, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 12th of the same month, and on February 2, 2015, Defendant A was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Jung-gu District Court on February 2, 2015.

“Criminal Facts” in collusion with the Defendants to forge a real estate lease agreement and to borrow money from the victim D as security;

1. Around November 2012, at the “G,” operated by Defendant A in the territory of the real estate lease contract, the “Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H”, the “500,000,000 won”, the “O million won” in the remainder column, the “Yeocheon-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City I Apartment-gu, 324,702” in the resident registration number column, the “J” in the “K”, the lessee’s address column, the “N” in the “N”, the resident registration number column, and the “N” and the “O” and the “B” in the “N” and the name column in the “N” and the “N” and the “B” column in the resident registration number column in the “N” and the “N” and the “N” column in the resident registration number column of the Gangnam-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City.

As a result, the Defendants forged one copy of the real estate lease contract, which is a private document on rights and obligations in L name for the purpose of exercising them in collusion.

2. Around November 15, 2012, at the Government-dong (Seoul Dongdaemun-gu) of the Government-Si around November 15, 2012, presented a forged real estate lease agreement as described in the above 1.1. via P, the victim D, who is unaware of the fact, saying, “The Government-dong (Seoul Dongdaemun-gu) will give three (3) interest on the loan of KRW 20 million on the loan of KRW 1,00,000,000 on the loan of KRW 20,000.”

However, in fact, the above real estate lease contract was forged, and there was no intention or ability to repay the money from the victim as agreed even if it was borrowed money from the victim.

Accordingly, the Defendants are the defendants.