1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

purport, purport, and.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiffs are married couple of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D building 501, and the defendant is residing in the D building 502.

D Building is a multi-family housing that has a 2nd unit in structure, and has a 1st floor entrance through a common stairs.

B. The Defendant filed a lawsuit for return of unjust enrichment against the Plaintiffs in relation to the reconstruction of the said collective housing, but the judgment of the losing court became final and conclusive. Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed a motion for determination of the amount of litigation costs against the Defendant, which the Defendant decided that the amount of litigation costs to be reimbursed to the Plaintiff A was KRW 570,000, and then filed a motion for seizure of corporeal movables in the Defendant’s residence with the enforcement officer of this court as an executive title.

C. On July 30, 2013, the Defendant visited the Defendant’s residence. Around 13:25 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) from the public corridor between the Plaintiff and the enforcement officer of this court and the two police officers dispatched to the Plaintiff’s report at the time, the Defendant: (b) deemed that there was a badly bad year, and that there was a mistake of the Plaintiff’s residents; (c) where there were four police officers, etc. who were dispatched to the Defendant’s residence; (d) the Defendant attempted to see this opening, “The same year,” (e.g., robbery, robbery, robbery, brus, and bomines; and (e) the Plaintiffs, who attempted to kill the Plaintiff’s property in the shape of the E-State, i.e., the Plaintiff’s appearance.”

After that, the defendant was indicted as charged of insulting the plaintiffs, and was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 4 months and 2 years of suspended execution in the first instance court (this Court Decision 2014No. 3329). After that, the defendant's appeal and appeal against the above judgment are all dismissed, and the above judgment is therefore dismissed.