A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

The defendant is a person who resides in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C502, and the victim D and E are the persons who reside in the above C501, and the victim D and E are the persons who live in the above C501, and 7 million won of the unjust enrichment return lawsuit filed by the defendant against the victims in relation to F (current C) and paid 570,000 won of the costs of lawsuit, upon application for compulsory execution by the Seoul Central District Court enforcement officer around July 30, 2013

On July 30, 2013, 13:25, 300, the Defendant insultingd the victims who were in the house with a large voice that is able to be heard by neighboring residents in the front corridor No. C501 on July 30, 2013, by saying, “I am the same age as this year? I am the case where I am, am, am, am, am, and am. I am, am. I am., am. I am., am. I am., am. I am., am., robbery, robbery, robbery, robbery, I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. am. am., I am. am., I am. I am. am., I am. I am. am., I am. am., I am.. am.......”

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, and H in part;

1. Some of the statements made by the prosecution against the accused in the examination protocol of suspect;

1. Some statements concerning the suspect examination protocol of the defendant;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. CDA or USB;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing recording records;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The judgment of the defendant and his defense counsel on the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act during the suspension of execution of execution shall be conducted by the defendant and his defense counsel. The defendant did not have only the victim and his family, his family, the defendant's family, and the police officer at the time of the defendant's bath, and even if there was an execution officer, the police officer and the execution officer