logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2011. 04. 14. 선고 2010두28991 판결
(심리불속행) 부동산임대업 관련 재화의 공급으로 보지 않는 사업의 양도인지 여부[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2010Nu13564 ( November 23, 2010)

Case Number of the previous trial

early 2009-0159 ( October 16, 2009)

Title

(Trialless Conduct) Whether the transfer of business related to real estate rental is not considered to be the supply of goods

Summary

It is difficult to deem that there is no clear evidence to prove that there was a transfer of facts, such as the appraisal of assets or business rights related to leasing business conducted by the transferor, or the confidential management organization of customer relationship.

Cases

2010Du28991 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing Value-Added Tax

Plaintiff-Appellee

○○ Co., Ltd.

Defendant-Appellant

○ Head of tax office

The Seoul High Court Decision 2010Nu13564 Decided November 23, 2010

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

Although the lower judgment was examined in light of the records of this case, it is recognized that the assertion on the grounds of appeal falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning Procedure

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Reference materials.

If the grounds of final appeal are not included in the grounds of final appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of trial without continuing the deliberation on the merits of the grounds of final appeal, and refers to the system of dismissal of final appeal by judgment without continuing the deliberation on the merits of the grounds of final appeal (see this case, e.g.,

arrow