The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal stated that the victim E was under the influence of alcohol and was in a state of no mind, and the defendant stated that he was not aware of the fact that he was not under the influence of alcohol and that he was not under the influence of alcohol, and that the victim D made a statement to the investigative agency that "the defendant and the victim E could have contacted the face of the victim E" can be seen as an expression to reduce the defendant's assault. H made a statement to the effect that "the defendant had made the victim E" at the investigative agency, and H made a statement to the effect that "the defendant made the victim E at the time of the defendant's testimony," but at the court of the court of the court below, it was time eight months after the date of the testimony of the court below, and at the time of the prosecutor's questioning, the prosecutor's statement to the effect that "the specific contents of the defendant's statement are not consistent with memory for a long time," and thus, it should be deemed that the defendant's credibility in the investigative agency's statement is sufficient to find the facts guilty.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the instant facts charged and Nonindicted Party C, around 01:30 on April 5, 2013, 2013, around the south terminal located in the Changwon-si Machipo-si Sea Campaign, the victim D and the victim E, who fright to work for the Defendant’s women, sent the face of the said D one time as drinking, and the victim E fright up to the floor of the fright to cut off.

The defendants live together and drink the above E.