logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 01. 28. 선고 2015두55301 판결
(심리불속행) 사실과 다른 세금계산서에 해당하고, 선의·무과실의 거래당사자에 해당하지 않음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2015-Nu-32300 ( October 14, 2015)

Title

(A) It constitutes a false tax invoice, and is not a party to a transaction with good faith or negligence.

Summary

(C) The tax invoice of this case is a false tax invoice, and it cannot be deemed that there was no negligence on the part of the Plaintiff on the part of the Plaintiff. Thus, the disposition of this case denying the input tax deduction under the tax invoice of this case is legitimate.

Related statutes

Article 16 of the Value-Added Tax Act

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and therefore, all of the appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per

arrow