logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2014. 10. 27. 선고 2014두38958 판결
(심리불속행) 사실과 다른 세금계산서에 해당하고, 이를 알지 못한데 과실이 없다고 할 수 없음.[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Daejeon High Court 2013Nu3489 (Law No. 12, 2014)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho Jae-chul2012 Before 3662 ( November 07, 2012)

Title

(Invitation without Trial) It constitutes a tax invoice different from the fact, and it shall not be deemed that there is no negligence on the part of the accused.

Summary

(C) The tax invoice of this case is a false tax invoice, and it cannot be deemed that there was no negligence on the part of the Plaintiff on the part of the Plaintiff. Thus, the disposition of this case denying the input tax deduction under the tax invoice of this case is legitimate.

Related statutes

Articles 16 and 17 of the Value-Added Tax Act

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the judgment below and the appellate brief examined the records of this case, but the appellant's grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, or are recognized to be groundless. Thus, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of

arrow