The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant was serving as an instructor from “F driving school,” which is a supplementary driving school operated by the victim E, and served as an instructor at the above driving school on December 20, 2014.

After withdrawal with G, the above G is a person who works as an instructor in the vicinity of the above private teaching institute.

On March 11, 2015, the Defendant filed an application for the prohibition of business with the Seoul Northern District Court against the Defendant, G, etc., and presented various evidence to the effect that the Defendant, etc. enticed the students of the said FFF to “H driving school.” As such, the Defendant: (a) notified the students whose name was confirmed in the above evidence of the foregoing fact; and (b) had the aforementioned students, parents, the parents of the said students, and their parents, etc. feel a good image of the Defendant.

On April 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was the first student of the said FF Institute in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul; (b) was submitted to the competent court by using the Internet Kakakao Stockholm, the third grade of middle school; and (c) was aware of the fact that the president had submitted the content of the Karan Stockholm to the court under his real name; and (d) was so aware of the fact that the president had submitted the content of the Karan

Along with the need to know, I send the word “Iskhn’s real name data in the past, so Isn’t know about how Isn’s real name data in the past court. Isn’t send the message to Iskh’s own name.” The above J sent the word “Iskh’s Mah’s Mahn’s

The respondent sent the answer stating that the real name is high, and again submitted evidentiary materials under the name of the student Stockholm;

We tried to cause damage to the Bagman test, even though the lag had the lag, but did not go to the court, and the name of the lag was written by the court.

The word “slova” was sent.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly duplicating facts through information and communication networks with a view to slandering the victim.

2. Determination

(a) the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc.;